on 01-07-2014 08:09
on 01-07-2014 08:09
Hi
Is it right that after I got my Xperia Z1 replaced, (due to its lack of water proofness) I recieved a Z1 Compact, supposedly due to a lack of Z1 in stock.
I signed for the phone at the time, but later realising that the £600 phone I have been and continue to pay off has been replaced with a £379.99 phone, this somehow doesnt seem fair.
I was not informed of this change until I went to collect the swapped phone at store, and considering I was using a loan phone (Nokia 206) I was just glad to join the 21st century again.
Is it right that this can be done, as it feels like Ive been a little hard done by on this
Any advice would be appreciated
Adam
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 01-07-2014 08:11
on 01-07-2014 08:11
on 01-07-2014 08:30
on 01-07-2014 08:30
This sounds absolutely outrageous to me How can they get away with it?
I can't think of any other item you would buy ..then go to exchange it and be fobbed off with a replacement costing £200 less!
I know the key is, the op signed for it...but seems shady practice to me.
Veritas Numquam Perit
on 01-07-2014 08:32
on 01-07-2014 08:32
on 01-07-2014 09:15
on 01-07-2014 09:15
on 01-07-2014 10:47
on 01-07-2014 10:47
Isn't the z1 compact similar specs to the z1 with the exception of the screen size?
As there is an obvious difference in price I would ask for the tariff cost to be adjusted accordingly.
on 01-07-2014 10:50
on 01-07-2014 10:50
@aldaweb wrote:Isn't the z1 compact similar specs to the z1 with the exception of the screen size?
As there is an obvious difference in price I would ask for the tariff cost to be adjusted accordingly.
Yes, pretty much the same phone in a smaller case http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Sony-Xperia-Z1-Compact,Sony-Xperia-Z1/phones/8283,8000
on 01-07-2014 11:41
on 01-07-2014 11:41
on 01-07-2014 11:52
on 01-07-2014 11:52
Not in my opinion. Why should they think a phone costing £200 less is an acceptable replacement whlst still expecting the same payment.
on 01-07-2014 11:56
on 01-07-2014 11:56
@jonsie wrote:Not in my opinion. Why should they think a phone costing £200 less is an acceptable replacement whlst still expecting the same payment.
Agree totally @jonsie As I said earlier, it sounds outrageous to me.
You wouldn't buy a diamond ring for £600.. take it back and then be happy with a cubic zirconia replacement
Veritas Numquam Perit