I did not understood you clearly... do you mean: fraud or theft implies the deliberate act, e.g. claim that the services have been restored, while this is obviously not true?
Regarding the breach of the contract, do you mean: planned, scheduled activity which causes the restriction of the services provision, or lack of such services for some period of time?
Thaks for the explanation then, I fully agree with both provided by you.
Of course, all of the above would be void if:
a) your previous statement that the services were restored was the lie;
b) the so-called upgrade of network would be the activity completely independent from the O2;
Otherwise - the O2 is fully responsible for the faults during the procedure implementation.
Finally, if my SIM card would be faulty, e.g. it would be damaged in the way preventing its registration in network or recognition by the phone - I'd be unable to make any calls.
Since the network upgrade, as I stated previously - I'm able to make the calls, while when someone else tries to call me - such person is obtaning (from O2) the message: the number you have dialled is not recognised (means: O2 kicked me out of network).
Qoud erat demonstrandum
Just as the announcement: when I'll have the nearest bill forom O2 (IF my services will be restored until this time), my wallet would be upgrading, so it is likely that it will be able to accept any money, while the withdrawal may be impacted by the upgrade. I only hope that O2, being fair company, will wait so patiently as I'm waiting now.
