30-01-2014 20:13 - edited 31-01-2014 00:06
30-01-2014 20:13 - edited 31-01-2014 00:06
Now, I'm not saying this is guarenteed or anything but it's worth a go for reasons I'll explain later so please no comments regarding whether it will or won't work. It's better than doing nothing.
This link
Explains all the necessary actions you need to take to challenge the 2.7% increase in pay monthly tarriffs.
Please read the whole link as there is different advice for different situations.
For information I have complained to O2 and it has been rejected HOWEVER it has beeen taken up by the Communications Ombudsman so fingers crossed.
Now, because of this. This has cost O2 £300.00 which is by far more than they will get from me from the price hike so even if the Ombudsman rejects it it has still cost O2 more than their 2.7% hike that they'll get from me so it won't be all bad.
Like I've said so far as it's a new increase and obviously rulings (if any) will not have come into force yet so it's a trial at the moment.
There are various ways you can pursue this and all is explained in the link however some are free and some are paid. The route you choose is your choice, I personally have chosen the free route.
Like I said please read all the link first and follow the advice to the letter and we should (Fingers Crossed) get somewhere with this.
Good Luck
Gillsfankev
Credit for discovering this goes to member BROWNI
04-02-2014 13:15
@a_hcir wrote:
@MI5 wrote:
It was never a "fixed price".
Where did you see that written anywhere?This has been covered about a trillion times on this forum, if I wasn't so full of violent acidic rage I wouldn't reply because it's covered so much, but I'll reiterate because I want you to believe and become one of us: o2 and their partners misrepresent these contracts as fixed price, fixed term contracts. If you disagree because you are someone who fastidiously reads every bit of small print ever, that's your opinion, but in the opinion of the majority it's a slimy way of doing business and we'll seek redress as it inner right, duck. If they don't want to fix their price, they should say so at the point of sale (e.g. "£20 per month, rising at RPI (currently 2.7%) each April, 24 month contract" instead of "£20 per month, 24 month contract").
There wasn't any guarantee that there would be a price rise, just like there isn't one for next year. Its simply terms in a contract that allows O2 to raise the price if they want to.
Sales advisors don't have a crystal ball just like the rest of us don't. If they aren't to know theres going to be an increase, why would they say anything?
Its like them saying to you 'Yes take this contract but next February there might be a network issue causing you lost service for a couple of days. Thought I'd tell you, just incase..."
04-02-2014 13:17
04-02-2014 13:17
04-02-2014 13:24 - edited 04-02-2014 13:24
04-02-2014 13:24 - edited 04-02-2014 13:24
Look, guys, we'll never agree on this. I think we should agree to disagree and seek our own paths of enlightment on this issue. If you're happy to pony up the extra dough each month, then I give you massive respect and wish you well. I, on the otherhand, want o2 to put this right. For them to tell me that they're putting up the price mid contract and say I should be glad of it because I can sell my phone to o2 recycle is like having someone rob my wallet and then phone me up later to call me an offensive name.
Whether you're ponying up the dough or fighting "the man", I wish you all luck!
04-02-2014 21:22
04-02-2014 21:22
11-02-2014 12:45
11-02-2014 12:45
Well blow me down with a feather. I kind of expected it given the goings on over on the moneysavingexpert thread, but I've just had the "Ombudsman thinks o2's price rise is a commerical decision and doesn't believe it can deal with your complaint" response from the ombudsman.
I think this must be a boilerplate response because there was no response to the reasons the hike must be considered material detiement (as given on the saga website link on the first post). I've just written back to them with a link to OFCOM GC9.6 stating that they must review my reasons for material detriment once again, but I reckon this is the end of the road.
Looks like o2 have won this round, folks. Now to find out just how unlimited my text message and minutes bundle is so I can get the benefit of the extra £1 a month I'm spending... Any suggestions for cool numbers to ring?
02-04-2014 09:46
02-04-2014 09:46
02-04-2014 10:10
ADVERSE CLAUSE PEEPS LOOK IT UP AND YOU WILL FIND YOU CAN LEAVE.. WJO EVA GOT THE CONTRACT (02 IN THIS CASE) THEY HAVE GOT TO BE IN BREECH OF YOUR CONTRACT. THRY MAYBE ALLOWED ONCE A YEAR TO PUT PRICES UP AND THATS IN APRIL NOT 3/4 TIMES THROUGH THE YEAR. CHECK YA CONTRACTS.. ANY CHANGE AT ALL AS TO WHAT YOU SIGNED FOR IF SO TELL THEM ADVERSE CLAUSE.. YOU DIDNT HAVE A SAY OR GIVEN DECISION RIGJTS TO ACCEPT OR DENY THESE CHANGES SO THEY CANT DO IT (ONLY ON THE BUDGET IS THIS NOT AGAINST BREECH OF CONTRACT).. AGAIN HPPE THIS HELPS
02-04-2014 10:14
02-04-2014 10:14
02-04-2014 10:18
02-04-2014 10:18
Have to agree. I can't even make sense of most of the content of the posts.
02-04-2014 10:21
02-04-2014 10:21
http://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Pay-Monthly-and-Pay-Go/O2-mid-term-rise-v-ofcom-ruling-Facts/m-p/611520... the facts and vat has not been changed from its current 20% since 04/01/2011 when it went up from 17.5%