on 02-02-2014 13:38
on 02-02-2014 13:38
on 03-02-2014 14:53
on 03-02-2014 14:53
@Anonymous wrote:
Possibly. But I'm sure the lady and gent in the know would be more reliable.
You mean the mummy and the daddy of the community?
They're strangely like a fountain of knowledge and know everything.
on 03-02-2014 14:54
on 03-02-2014 14:54
on 03-02-2014 15:01
on 03-02-2014 15:01
Have to leave the thread now Sorry guys...I have to go out...
Been a fascinating debate Kev..its great to start from a different perspective.
See you all later and keep up the good work...
We maybe need a revolution...sorry I meant resolution
Veritas Numquam Perit
on 03-02-2014 15:03
on 03-02-2014 15:03
on 03-02-2014 15:05
on 03-02-2014 15:05
Bye for now Cleoriff.
We can continue discussing/debating at a later time and you can do what your level says and get fired up
Enjoy the rest of your day.
on 03-02-2014 15:22
on 03-02-2014 15:27
on 03-02-2014 15:27
on 04-02-2014 14:02
My own 2p worth on webchat advisors:
For simple enquiries, they can be really good. Where they fall down is when they try and go above their station, and deal with enquiries that they should be passing on. When they do this they invariably fail, sometimes promising things that can't be delivered, or creating more of a mess than they started with.
Customer Service advisors on the phone get frustrated with webchat, but maybe get a skewed view. After all, no-one phones in to say how happy they are with webchats, as when the query is dealt with the customers don't tend to phone in.