on 17-01-2017 12:48
on 17-01-2017 12:48
Did you know that emoji's are classed as pictures and each is charged at 50p.
I didn't know this until I started noticing a spike in my bill. Even though o2's terms and conditions state that the pay monthly tariff doesn't include mms it doesn't specify that emoji's are part of this charge.
So customers, beware that even when you type a smiley face like ':-)' and it gets drawn as a picture O2 will charge you..
A while back 4 text msgs used to get converted to one picture msg but then how would o2 make money if they are offering unlimited text msgs in their tariff? Therefore, someone in their company came up with this genius idea of firstly not including mms in the tariff but the real genius is in charging for emoji's and the unsuspecting customers don't realize what they are paying for until you get told about it!!!
Sound familiar? This is exactly what happened when premium msg services started and the ill infitmed customers didn't know what was happening to their bills until the regulations changed and customers knew how to stop premium charges!!!
Hopefully, this msg is useful to unsuspecting customers like me who don't realize unless specifically abd directly nformed about updates and changes exploiting loopholes.
Well done, o2.
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 17-01-2017 12:56
on 17-01-2017 12:56
on 17-01-2017 13:01
on 17-01-2017 13:01
The 4 for 1 mms were older Simplicity tariffs. We do know about the emoji problem which is why there is a community help page.
on 17-01-2017 13:07
on 17-01-2017 13:07
on 17-01-2017 13:14
on 17-01-2017 13:14
It's not just O2 that charge either. EE and Vodafone customers will pay for sending emoji's. This is a topic that has been discussed publicly for about 2 years now. I haven't done an extensive search but this article was published in 2014 http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/phones/2014/12/got-a-samsung-phone-you-could-get-charged-extra...
Veritas Numquam Perit
on 17-01-2017 13:18
on 17-01-2017 13:18
on 17-01-2017 13:33
on 17-01-2017 13:33
on 17-01-2017 13:35
on 17-01-2017 13:44
on 17-01-2017 13:44
on 17-01-2017 13:48