15-01-2015 11:11 - edited 15-01-2015 11:37
15-01-2015 11:11 - edited 15-01-2015 11:37
Hi guys,
I hope you're all doing well!
Towards the end of 2014, the community team mentioned that we intend to hold a few discussions based on some of the actions and programmes we conduct on the community. One of these topics is the community guidelines themselves, which you can read here.
These guidelines have been used since this team took over management on the community and while a few minor amendments have been made, they have remained mostly consistent for a long period. It's often difficult to cover all bases in detail in community guidelines, as while a thorough set of rules helps to govern a community, too many rules and regulations can also provide a very inhibitive atmosphere - something our team wants to avoid for your benefit.
However, we’d love to hear your thoughts on the guidelines. What aspects do you think are very important? Which parts need more explanation in your view? Is there anything you would add or remove?
While we want to hear your thoughts, below are a few points from our perspective that need to be taken into account when posting your views:
We're really excited to hear your thoughts and I hope you will enjoy posting your views on this!
on 15-01-2015 16:06
on 15-01-2015 16:06
@Anonymous wrote:
@Anonymous simple, if you think it's pointless then just don't read it & move on
I agree but not all members are like that
on 15-01-2015 16:08
on 15-01-2015 16:14
on 15-01-2015 16:14
I have always understood pointless posts to fall into 2 categories
1) When someone posts something which has already been said....and adds unasked for information...or words it so it looks slightly different but isn't
2) Or ....those posts that people start threads about, which are of.no interest to anyone else. ...
However No 2 will always be open to debate. What interests me ...may not interest others etc
Veritas Numquam Perit
on 15-01-2015 16:18
on 15-01-2015 16:18
on 15-01-2015 16:18
If only there was a way of not opening threads you didn't care about and didn't want to read......oh wait......just dont open them!!
on 15-01-2015 16:23
on 15-01-2015 16:25
on 15-01-2015 16:25
All members should do that but at the moment they don't.
There are many threads that I see the name of and it doesn't look interesting to me or I don't think i'd understand it so I either ignore it, or read the first post. I don't post anything about it being 'not interesting' because it clearly was if I made the effort to open it.
on 15-01-2015 16:26
If ever there was an argument for removing the Off Topic section completely it is that inane Wanty's New Place. It is hard to believe that any reasonably well educated adults can contribute such utter nonsense with its obvious glorification of alcohol and the outlandish behaviour its consumption leads to. But it seems, strangely, to be very acceptable to the Moderatorial Team - at least since the thread now stands at well over 500 contributions it would be hard to think otherwise.
on 15-01-2015 16:32
on 15-01-2015 16:32
@Cleoriff wrote:I have always understood pointless posts to fall into 2 categories
1) When someone posts something which has already been said....and adds unasked for information...or words it so it looks slightly different but isn't
2) Or ....those posts that people start threads about, which are of.no interest to anyone else. ...
However No 2 will always be open to debate. What interests me ...may not interest others etc
There is a 3rd....posts that add absolutely nothing to the thread content.
Eg
"Good news"
"Enjoy"
"LOL"
"Awesome news"
"I agree"
"No worries"
on 15-01-2015 16:34
on 15-01-2015 16:34
@Anonymous wrote:If ever there was an argument for removing the Off Topic section completely it is that inane Wanty's New Place. It is hard to believe that any reasonably well educated adults can contribute such utter nonsense with its obvious glorification of alcohol and the outlandish behaviour its consumption leads to. But it seems, strangely, to be very acceptable to the Moderatorial Team - at least since the thread now stands at well over 500 contributions it would be hard to think otherwise.
Even intelligent people need to have fun