on 27-10-2016 21:17
on 27-10-2016 21:17
on 27-10-2016 21:23
on 03-02-2018 09:57
They certainly are !
Leicester and Nottingham have already benefitted from this delivering a most welcome ‘spike’ in 4G coverage and capacity.
O2 have a very small 1800mHz presence essentially a legacy from the 2G days c 20 years ago. This was implemented purely to improve network capacity in places like Leeds, Slough, Birmingham, Wolverhampton and London.Back then O2/BT Cellnet mainstay was 900mHz along with Vodafone whereas Orange and one2one (Remember them?) were on 1800mHz.
O2 have refarmed all their 2G 1800mHz spectrum onto 4G now. They’re also refarming out as much spare 3G 2100mHz as they can. Biggest improvement will be as an when they acquire a chunk of 2300Mhz. When they get that and implement it on the network all the things like CA etc will be possible with them.
on 04-02-2018 18:04
on 04-02-2018 18:04
I think once again O2 will once again be also-rans in any bidding for that....
on 06-02-2018 20:01
on 06-02-2018 20:01
I disagree.
Bandwidth is a major issue for O2 and their reputation will be damaged if they end up with 5Mhz , Three gets 15mHz and EE gets 20mHz for example.
O2 need to get at least 20mHz of 2300mHz to be credible. They simply cannot afford to end up as a an also-ran on this one.
Without that they are going to struggle big time.
07-02-2018 16:25 - edited 07-02-2018 16:26
07-02-2018 16:25 - edited 07-02-2018 16:26
I will find the ofcom document in a minute but I believe EE are excluded from some of the auctions due to bandwidth dominance from mergers that were allowed unlike 3 and o2 merger
ofcom acuction document https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/latest/media/media-releases/2017/ofcom-sets-rules-for-mobile-sp...