on 15-05-2013 10:11
on 15-05-2013 10:11
My son has 66668 numbers as both recieved and sent messages. What is this?
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 15-05-2013 10:15
on 15-05-2013 10:15
http://www.phonepayplus.org.uk/Number-Checker/Check-a-Number-Results.aspx?ncn=66668
on 15-05-2013 10:15
on 15-05-2013 10:15
http://www.phonepayplus.org.uk/Number-Checker/Check-a-Number-Results.aspx?ncn=66668
on 15-05-2013 10:48
@adamtemp64 wrote:http://www.phonepayplus.org.uk/Number-Checker/Check-a-Number-Results.aspx?ncn=66668
Here's a question, the following presumably forms part of the T&Cs for this service :
"Account holder's permission required and must be aged 16 or over"
If that hasn't been complied with then should the charges be refunded ?
on 15-05-2013 10:59
on 15-05-2013 10:59
@guest2 is correct and a complaint can be lodged directly from the page I linked to assuming under 16
on 27-01-2014 11:33
My 12 yr old daughter spent £35 on this over 2 days. Fortunately I just got her bill soi stopped it getting higher. I contacted Bongo on the number on their website and they agreed to refund the charges and block her number.
O2 say they cannot block premium texts - which is crazy as they can block premium phone numbers. Nearly all these premium text services begin with a number other than "0" so should be easy.
O2 sort it out!
on 27-01-2014 11:44
on 27-01-2014 11:44
I would also report the copmpany to phonepayplus as above this company needs stopping
on 27-01-2014 11:52
on 27-01-2014 12:24
on 27-01-2014 12:24
@Anonymous wrote:
While it's not their fault I must admit I don't see why O2 can't block premium texts can't or won't?
In a previous thread, the reason given was that they'd have to build & maintain a whitelist and may inadvertently block SMS services that aren't necessarily premium rate (like those ones the local radio stations have etc.)
However, I'd argue that reasoning is a load of poppycock - if they can accurately bill for these premium rate services, it is trivial to block them. In reality, I believe it's because the operators take a nice chunk of the revenue and so have little incentive to block them, backed by a toothless regulator who have a name that sounds like a dodgy company that provides premium rate services (phonepayplus) that doesn't advocate having a network level block for these services that only 0.0000000000000000000001% of the age appropriate population are actually interested in.
on 27-01-2014 12:41
on 27-01-2014 12:41