on 05-02-2015 21:44
on 05-02-2015 21:44
The BBC published this article today. How long has it been known about here? Sheesh!
on 05-02-2015 21:48
on 05-02-2015 21:50
on 05-02-2015 21:50
Only 2 years behind. That's some ace reporter they have
on 05-02-2015 22:25
on 05-02-2015 22:25
Now...in their defence, how many people do we still get on here complaining about the cost of emoticons and claiming they didnt know?
Maybe it is a good thing they've done....perhaps it will be noticed more as it has made news...#just saying....
Veritas Numquam Perit
on 05-02-2015 22:30
on 05-02-2015 22:30
I never knew about this - but then I've added emoticons to text messages and never had them charged as anything but text messages.
Clearly there are emoticons, and then there are emoticons.
on 05-02-2015 22:35
on 05-02-2015 22:35
Perhaps they have had an influx of complaints to Watchdog?
on 05-02-2015 22:36
on 05-02-2015 22:36
Fellwalker wrote:Clearly there are emoticons, and then there are emoticons.
Yes there are some differences.....
There is some further advice here http://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Other-Products-Services/Accidental-MMS-Sending-and-How-to-Avoid-it/td-p...
on 08-02-2015 13:40
on 08-02-2015 13:40
@jonsie wrote:Perhaps they have had an influx of complaints to Watchdog?
There was an article in the Daily Mail yesterday of somebody complaining of a high monthly bill due to putting a smiley face on some of their texts and was confused as they had an unlimited text tarriff. Their bill was about £20 more than usual. They must send a lot of texts. Maybeit is juts getting repeated in the newsevery so often when people complain about it, but then it would weaken their case if they appealed to their network as the netowkr could turn round and say that it is becoming common knowledge.
on 08-02-2015 15:36
@gemz4the1 wrote:
@jonsie wrote:Perhaps they have had an influx of complaints to Watchdog?
I knew the Daily mail liked "news" that aren't really news but this is just pure desperation to fill the page... £20 of extra charges is apparently a high monthly bill... As for them "appealing" to the network....they don't have a case to appeal...and the network will probably offer £5 as a goodwill gesture and tell them they wont do it again....
- There was an article in the Daily Mail yesterday of somebody complaining of a high monthly bill due to putting a smiley face on some of their texts and was confused as they had an unlimited text tarriff. Their bill was about £20 more than usual. They must send a lot of texts. Maybeit is juts getting repeated in the newsevery so often when people complain about it, but then it would weaken their case if they appealed to their network as the netowkr could turn round and say that it is becoming common knowledge.
ps - £20 equals 50 MMS so she is really not a high texter, if she was, this news would make sense.
on 10-02-2015 20:27
on 10-02-2015 20:27