24-07-2012 21:37 - edited 24-07-2012 21:40
24-07-2012 21:37 - edited 24-07-2012 21:40
With luck nobody here is involved with this, but as there is a risk of some of the 2845 letters being sent out to totally innocent O2 customers, I thought it would help to post this update:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-18968223
Of course if you're not innocent now would be a good time to get your story straight.
on 01-12-2012 16:52
on 01-12-2012 16:52
01-12-2012 16:58 - edited 01-12-2012 17:02
01-12-2012 16:58 - edited 01-12-2012 17:02
There is very little chance of anyone actually paying any intended charge, as if this article is accurate, GE have no intention of pursuing anyone through the courts, hoping instead that people will pay by feeling inimidated by their letter:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Dover#Golden_Eye_.E2.80.93_Speculative_Invoicing
Extract:
On 26 March 2012,[66] the High Court ordered O2, to hand over the details of 9,124 (later reduced to 2,845) of its customers details to Golden Eye. However, the judge deemed the proposed £700 fine to be "unsupported and unsupportable" and that the bill payer couldn't automatically be assumed to be guilty of any alleged copyright violation,[67] and therefore any claim made by Golden Eye/Ben Dover Productions couldn't move forward unless the recipient of the company's speculative invoicing letters admitted their own guilt[68] due to the fact that evidence used is unreliable.
No way of course of knowing the accuracy of the information here.
on 02-12-2012 10:36
I received a letter from O2 yesterday saying the same thing. The problem I have is that I know without any shadow of a doubt that I am not responsible, nor is my brother or mum who I live with. I'm more than happy, as is everyone else, for them to have my/our computers and check for themselves that I/we havent downloaded or uploaded anything from this company or any other. We dont have static IP's and our network is passworded.
I'd like to say i'm not worried because I know we've done nothing wrong but I am worried because of a potential fine etc. I'd happily go to court to challenge anything they say but it seems like its a losing fight and will cost more in the long run.
02-12-2012 13:57 - edited 02-12-2012 15:46
02-12-2012 13:57 - edited 02-12-2012 15:46
The good thing is that atleast 02/Be gave the citizen advice number so people can contact them and they are well aware of this issue so they can really help you out.
90% people have a dynamic ip and my ip changes very frequently, heck if you turn off your router for 10 minutes you will get a new ip address.
http://acsbore.wordpress.com/
Looks like 02 sold each ip for £2.20 and plusnet has challenged the case so they won't be required to hand out their customers details.
Hopefully I won't get the letter or anyone who hasn't downloaded their films, if you do get a letter contact citizen advice straightaway.
02-12-2012 14:38 - edited 02-12-2012 14:40
02-12-2012 14:38 - edited 02-12-2012 14:40
@Anonymous wrote:
90% people have a dynamic ip and my ip changes very frequently, heck if you turn off your router for 10 minutes you will get a new ip address.
http://acsbore.wordpress.com/
Looks like 02 sold each ip for £2.20 and plusnet has challenged the case so they won't be required to hand out their customers details.
O2 IP addresses are sticky and unlikely to change often, they can last over a year without changing.
You can turn an O2 router off for months and still retain the same one.
Also O2 were forced to hand over the IP addresses by a court order, they were entitled to charge a fee for this.
on 02-12-2012 15:56
Sorry for the rants
Just frustrated and worried that i got the letter, i never download or upload **bleep**.
on 02-12-2012 16:29
on 02-12-2012 16:29
@Anonymous wrote:Sorry for the rants
Just frustrated and worried that i got the letter, i never download or upload **bleep**.
Not at all, you're entitled to be anxious and a bit cross that this has happened.
Please keep us up to date with how you get on, I don't think you'll end up paying anything.
on 02-12-2012 16:49
on 02-12-2012 16:49
on 02-12-2012 16:59
on 02-12-2012 16:59
@Anonymous wrote:
I havent downloaded any of their films, or uploaded any of their films but i still had a letter.
It was reported in the earlier articles that their evidence is flawed.
on 02-12-2012 17:06
on 02-12-2012 17:06