on 25-10-2013 14:26
on 25-10-2013 14:26
Have just returned from a mini-break in Spain with Mrs phillpark. Whilst there I turned my data off, so was reliant on WiFi to Kik/Whatsapp the kids etc. I noticed that Mrs phillpark's Nokia Lumia had far far superior WiFi pick-up thn my HTC One X. In every bar/cafe/shop we went in with free WiFi she invariably picked up a stronger, more reliable WiFi signal than me.
This became quite frustrating when we had to decide where to sit in a bar based on my pi$$-poor WiFi reception and not where the sun was!
Why don't reviewers test the WiFi reception as part of the phone reviews? Would be very useful info in today's WiFi filled world!
on 25-10-2013 14:53
on 25-10-2013 14:53
on 25-10-2013 15:02
on 25-10-2013 15:02
on 25-10-2013 15:15
on 25-10-2013 15:15
on 25-10-2013 15:25
on 25-10-2013 15:25
on 30-10-2013 10:19
Get involved:
• New to the community? This is how you get help.
• Want to know who we are? Come and say hi to us.
• Want to have a chat? Drop me a direct message.
on 30-10-2013 11:06
on 30-10-2013 11:06
Any tests would have to be performed under standardised conditions in order to give an accurate comparison.
on 30-10-2013 11:26
on 30-10-2013 11:26
on 30-10-2013 11:49
on 30-10-2013 11:49
I can't see how this would work given that wifi signals are affected in the same way as any other signal and would vary in different conditions and locations. Admittedly strength varies from phone to phone but unless they standardise phone wifi antennae then I'm not sure you would get an accurate review of wifi reception and connection.