on 10-02-2010 16:02
on 10-02-2010 16:02
on 10-02-2010 16:05
on 10-02-2010 16:05
on 10-02-2010 16:09
on 10-02-2010 16:09
on 10-02-2010 16:11
on 10-02-2010 16:11
think of 2g as your old dialup modem on your pc and 3g as Broadband as a comparison
So a 2g handset will be very slow on the web a 3g enabled one in a 3g area will be much faster.
on 10-02-2010 16:15
on 10-02-2010 16:15
think of 2g as your old dialup modem on your pc and 3g as Broadband as a comparison
So a 2g handset will be very slow on the web a 3g enabled one in a 3g area will be much faster.
on 10-02-2010 16:21
on 10-02-2010 16:21
on 10-02-2010 17:05
on 10-02-2010 17:05
I should perhaps have made it clear, i'm won't be buying a 'posh' '3G' handset such as an iphone...
but i'm choosing between the cheaper end handsets, such as the lower spec blackberrys versus the Nokia E63.
I'm just wondering if the '3G capable' claim of the Nokias will really make a difference in data rate for ordinary surfing as compared to the Blackberry when using Simplicity.
Except on a Blackberry, it isn't that much faster! I use GPRS when at home (it's the area I live in) and to be honest, it is tolerable to use. Whilst out and about, 3G is good obviously faster but if your main aim is emails/messenger, you can't beat the BB! General surfing, well the BB browser is useable but don't expect too much.