28-09-2016 09:28 - edited 28-09-2016 09:29
28-09-2016 09:28 - edited 28-09-2016 09:29
Hi
I simply ask t because I keep getting conflicting responses. I assuming this is not the case as Samsung might as withdraw; what appears a really solid phone, despite the adverse press surrounding those batteries.
Daniel
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 28-09-2016 09:33
on 28-09-2016 09:33
on 28-09-2016 09:41
on 28-09-2016 09:43
on 28-09-2016 09:43
on 28-09-2016 09:43
on 28-09-2016 09:43
According to this article, even the new ones may be potential time bombs. Doesn't appear as if the nightmare for Samsung is over with this yet.
http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/safe-galaxy-note-7-explodes/
28-09-2016 09:46 - edited 28-09-2016 09:47
on 28-09-2016 09:49
@Bambino wrote:
According to this article, even the new ones may be potential time bombs. Doesn't appear as if the nightmare for Samsung is over with this yet.
http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/safe-galaxy-note-7-explodes/
Surely they barcode the batteries and reference the supplier batches to determine the faulty ones .. How dificult can this be?
on 28-09-2016 09:53
on 28-09-2016 09:53
Lots of "if, buts and maybe's" in that report.
According to the report, Renjie bought his device from online retailer JD, however it caught fire less than 24 hours after it was delivered. Of course, it remains to be seen how severe the issue really is — it is not exactly known yet whether the device was a newly built phone, or a device that just was not removed from the supply chain.
on 28-09-2016 10:07
on 28-09-2016 10:07
I'm just passing on what I've seen. I think Samsung are a good company, and they have made some great phones, but if this continues, or even if the speculation continues that there's a problem with this phone, it will not only hurt sales of the Note 7, but also Samsung's reputation in general.
on 28-09-2016 10:08
on 28-09-2016 10:08