02-10-2015 21:37 - edited 02-10-2015 21:43
02-10-2015 21:37 - edited 02-10-2015 21:43
I've had a pretty hellish experience with O2 over the last 2 days which almost made me give up on the network I've been a loyal customer to since 1997.
My new iPhone 6s arrived last Friday although it wasn't until Monday I managed to find the time to take it out of the box and set it up. Unfortunately the phone was subject to the "Slide to Ugrade" bug in iOS 9.0 and wouldn't go beyond that. I spent 2 hours on an online chat with Apple yesterday evening who after trying every possible thing, including multiple restore attempts, conceded the phone was faulty and I should return it to the carrier for a replacement.
This is where the fun started. I rang O2 and first of all was told that the issue was known about and to follow the steps on the Apple website. When I explained I had done this the advisor seemed a bit perplexed and had to put me through to some one else.
the crux of that conversation was that I couldn't take the phone in store and get it replaced, they would instead have to arrange a doorstep swap which wouldn't be for a few days.
I then asked had I brought the phone in an O2 store, could I replace it in store to which the answer was a resounding yes. However because I had dared to purchase it online, I wasn't able to do this and instead would have to wait.
My question is, why do customers who purchase in store get treated better than those that do it online? Surely O2 should want more people to purchase online as it reduces overheads?
The advisor saw my point but refused to budge saying he couldn't do anything. I that point I did something I'm loathe to do and that was to contact the CEO office by email. I received an immediate response which said they take 5 days to respond! But gave a phone number to call as well.
after a call and a heated debate, I managed to agree that a replacement phone would be sent out by courier and thus is arriving tomorrow.
my closing point is surely a customer shouldn't have to resort to such extreme measures just to get what seems to me to be basic customer care?
on 02-10-2015 22:13
on 02-10-2015 22:13
I have to say I agree with you totally. I do most of my shopping online and always have a choice of how to return....
Veritas Numquam Perit
on 02-10-2015 22:22
on 02-10-2015 22:22
@Cleoriff wrote:I do most of my shopping online and always have a choice of how to return....
Out of interest, can you give examples of places that allow an online order to be returned to a store (where the order was not fulfilled by that store)?
on 02-10-2015 22:34
on 02-10-2015 22:34
@MI5 wrote:
@Cleoriff wrote:I do most of my shopping online and always have a choice of how to return....
Out of interest, can you give examples of places that allow an online order to be returned to a store (where the order was not fulfilled by that store)?
Next, George, BHS, Matalan, Clarks, Boots ..etc etc etc..
Veritas Numquam Perit
on 02-10-2015 22:37
on 02-10-2015 22:55
on 02-10-2015 22:55
on 02-10-2015 23:10
on 02-10-2015 23:10
In fairness I bought a couple of pairs of jeans from Sports Direct 3 weeks ago. They did not allow instore return ...but everywhere else I shop does.....One mistake I made.... I ordered online and got my husband to return (to George) They were having none of it...:smileywink: It had to be me...with my card...
Veritas Numquam Perit
on 03-10-2015 00:04
on 03-10-2015 07:50
All of the mobile suppliers work exactly the same way, and calling it "discriminatory" is infantile.
on 03-10-2015 10:34
on 03-10-2015 10:34
I'm not sure of the issue here. If you buy a phone online then you return it to the suppliers or they do a doorstep exchange. If you buy instore then that's where you return it, you cannot return it direct to O2. Separate ways of buying irrespective of what other retailers do.
You complained and got next day exchange, problem solved hopefully. No way is anyone discriminated against and that's a pretty wild and outlandish statement in my opinion.