26-02-2015 16:31
Hi guys,
We recently held an open discussion on rewards and you all contributed beautifully, giving us lots to work on behind the scenes (charity, points, how we present the rewards, etc), but one thing I wanted gauge thoughts on the idea of nominations. Its an idea I've been thinking about since @Anonymous 's post here.
It consists of a nomination system, where all of you can nominate a post, guide, review, joke or whatever else you can think of to us via an open thread or PM:
- Myself or a member of the community team posts a thread asking for nominations before the usual rewards are calculated at the end of each month.
- You then either make a post on the thread, or send a PM to me with your suggestion. We'd never want to force a\nyone to do this publicly
- We then collate the nominations and pick the most popular. They would then receive a reward of a certain amount (undecided)
The idea of this is for us to be able to reward posts of a great quality, rather than just helpful activity in general. Also, we have many members who post less regularly, but still have fantastic insights and points to make when they do make a post. We want to celebrate that.
What are all of your thoughts on this? Is it s a nice thing to do? Does it promote favouritism? How would you do it differently (if at all)?
I'm eager to hear your thoughts. I'm personally very invested in this, but you're the ones who's opinions count a whole lot more
I hope that all makes sense!
Get involved:
• New to the community? This is how you get help.
• Want to know who we are? Come and say hi to us.
• Want to have a chat? Drop me a direct message.
28-02-2015 20:15
28-02-2015 20:15
28-02-2015 20:30
28-02-2015 20:38 - edited 28-02-2015 20:38
28-02-2015 20:38 - edited 28-02-2015 20:38
@viridis wrote:
I see no reason why not.
Nor me. It was the community team that first proposed the idea so I think it will happen. It certainly needs fine tuning though. I think they will need to provide a shortlist of posts for us to vote on. If not, you could have a scenario where 100 people could vote for a 100 completely different posts....
Veritas Numquam Perit
28-02-2015 22:00
28-02-2015 22:00
28-02-2015 22:12
28-02-2015 22:12
@Anonymous wrote:
I was referring to the monthly judging panel idea, not the overall nominations for awards suggestion.
Oh I see. I think you are probably right. Any panel would probably spend a month judging
Veritas Numquam Perit
28-02-2015 22:19
28-02-2015 22:19