05-12-2018 12:38 - edited 05-12-2018 13:11
05-12-2018 12:38 - edited 05-12-2018 13:11
In response to the latest article about Huawei on most news websites, do I approach O2 and complain they sold me an insecure device (P10)?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-46453425
on 05-12-2018 14:22
on 05-12-2018 14:22
Please note, this is not customer services and we cannot access your account. Do not publish personal details (email, phone number, bank account).
Link to our guide on how to contact them can be found here
05-12-2018 14:25 - edited 05-12-2018 14:27
05-12-2018 14:25 - edited 05-12-2018 14:27
I've been doing some more digging.
Huawei equipment supplied with an extra chip not specified in the design.
on 05-12-2018 14:27
on 05-12-2018 14:27
And there lies the problem, in the minds of most if the networking equipment is "compromised" then it follows suit that the consumer division is also in the same position. As for suspected for a long time, well practically all offshored manufacturing has been suspect in what they can apply "out of sight" but because of the cost, the risk v profit is in favour of the latter. No surprises really this is becoming more of an issue but thats another debate over outsourcing and labour costs.
I did post something a while back, but search for Cisco and CIA intercepts to see how far this goes for compromising equipment regardless of where its end destination is.
Also, Google is just as bad as is Apple as is Facebook as is...but there will always be the issue of security and who owns what and what use is the data no matter what the equipment is.
Sheepdog in 'post-it pad and pencil' mode
on 05-12-2018 14:28
on 05-12-2018 14:28
@JerryBilt wrote:I've been doing some more digging.
Huawei equipment supplied with an extra chip not specified in the design.
@JerryBiltThat link doesn't work. The forum filter has removed some of it...
Veritas Numquam Perit
on 05-12-2018 14:31
on 05-12-2018 14:33
on 05-12-2018 14:33
on 05-12-2018 14:34
on 05-12-2018 14:34
on 05-12-2018 18:32
on 05-12-2018 18:32