on 11-10-2011 23:20
on 11-10-2011 23:20
on 26-10-2011 18:56
on 26-10-2011 18:56
on 26-10-2011 21:41
on 26-10-2011 21:41
on 10-06-2012 11:56
on 10-06-2012 11:56
10-06-2012 12:05 - edited 10-06-2012 12:06
10-06-2012 12:05 - edited 10-06-2012 12:06
@Anonymous wrote:
Does anyone know how this was communicated and when it changed? just got a massive bill! as was not aware of the change
How can you get a bill on PAYG?
Contracts are not affected by this.
27-08-2012 18:16 - edited 27-08-2012 18:19
27-08-2012 18:16 - edited 27-08-2012 18:19
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/story/2012-02-24/att-data-sued-iphone/53236222/1
SIMI VALLEY, Calif. – When AT&T started slowing down the data service for his iPhone, Matt Spaccarelli, an unemployed truck driver and student, took the country's largest telecommunications company to small claims court. And won.
A precedent has been made about the so called "Unlimited" phone packages. I'll point out that as it says, this was in America, but if you know anything about Legalese as I do, you'll know that America also uses our legal system and therfore Legalese. Terms and conditions or not, it is fraudulent to use the term Unlimited for any service offered by a company unless the service truely is unlimited. Even with small print stating otherwise, Unlimited means unlimited... Without limits...
un·lim·it·ed/ˌənˈlimitid/
Adjective: |
| |
Synonyms: | boundless - unbounded - limitless - infinite |
on 27-08-2012 20:10
on 27-08-2012 20:10
We've had this argument the ASA and Ofcom appear to think it's ok for UK companies to describe "unlimited" in almost any way they choose.
on 12-06-2013 15:33
I run out of 'unlimited' o2 texts half way thorough every month, and pay £7.50. That is appauling considering on tesco mobile it is only £5 for 5000?
on 12-06-2013 15:35
on 12-06-2013 15:35
Why not use them then?
on 12-06-2013 16:35
I would struggle to use anywhere near 3000 a month but I guess everyones different