cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

iPhone 3GS Upgrade Policy

Anonymous
Not applicable
Interesting that so many "non-iPhone" customers are so keen to have their say - all a result of iPhone envy if you ask me!

Now onto the real issues...

Needless to say I'm outraged at O2's current policy. I completely understand the issues of subsidized handsets etc. and recouping the cost of the handset through the monthly charges, but O2's responses via their official twitter feed have only led to enflame the situation.

Point 1: O2 have stated that the reason iPhone 2G customers (of which I was one) were able to upgrade to 3G without a contract buy-out was because the 2G was not subsidized. Now just a reminder that the 2G was on sale for £279 (With inc@ 17.5%) on an 18 month contract. Now the 3GS is for sale at £274 (With VAT @ 15%) on an 18 month contract. So it follows that the 3GS is, like the 2G, not subsidized. I therefore put it to O2 via twitter that surely by this logic, 3GS customers would be able to upgrade to iPhone 4 this time next year, without a contract buy-out. O2's response read..."The 3GS is heavily subsidized by O2." When i pressed for more answers regarding this, my questions were conveniently ignored, despite questions either side of mine being answered! Clearly O2's "Masters of Twit" were stumped by this point!

Are we really to believe that the cost price of the iPhone 3GS to O2 is so much more than the cost price of the iPhone 2G?? So much that £279 for 2G = not subsidized, but £274 for 3GS = not just subsidized, but HEAVILY subsidized??

It appears to me that O2 have quite simply blown the bank to retain iPhone exclusivity and they are passing this on directly to it's customers.

Point 2: Name one other phone that carries a £200+ price tag on an 18/24 month contract? In fact, name one other phone that carries any kind of substantial price tag on such a long contract? There are none!! Thus it's clear: the iPhone is not simply another mobile phone! The price/contract situation is completely unparalleled so to now attempt to impose a blanket upgrade policy, saying that all O2 contracts adhere to the same rules smacks of moving the goalposts!

Point 3: AT&T are allowing iPhone 3G customers to upgrade without buyout once the reach the 12 month point of their current contract. Seems perfectly reasonable to me! O2 have certainly recouped plenty of their subsidy and then some from me over the last 12 months. Given that I'd be paying full price for the handset (£274), then none of my monthly payments over the next 6 months will be going to cover subsidy on the 3GS, because as stated above - it can not possibly be subsidized at that price! Therefore my payments over the next 6 months will still be paying back the subsidy on my 3G! Then in 12 months time, a non-buy-out upgrade to iPhone 4 where I am required to pay for the handset would again be perfectly reasonable! Many will state these 18 month contracts and then in essence 12 month contracts, however, this is not true. Such a model will ensure that O2 keep hold of customers as long as these customers keep coming back for the next iPhone. If I were to decide in 12 months that I don't want iPhone 4, I would still have to honour that final 6 months of the contract.

I suspect that O2 have filed accounts and given reports to shareholders etc that the acquisition cost of 3G customers last year will be absorbed over the next 18 months and this is what they're sticking to. As explained above, however, by O2's own admission the 2G at £279 was not subsidized, so therefore the 3GS at £274 must not be subsidized - unless there have been an inexplicable jump in the cost price of the iPhone to O2! So therefore, the next 6 month's payments would continue to pay back the subsidy on the 3G handset!


I'm sure that these points will not be addressed in any detail by O2 and some sort of blanket answer like I got earlier today with be the extent of their response, but I thought it pertinent to express this to fellow iPhone users in a similar position.

In closing, don't be lonely on launch day O2! Though there will be some hardcore fans who will begrudgingly pay the £450 to pay themselves out and buy the new handset, there will be an enormous amount of 3G users who will be unwilling to pay this enormous amount, especially now that they realise that in 12 month's time, another similarly enormous figure will be awaiting them! For the same reason, I suspect that a number of new customers will also be discouraged from taking on the iPhone 3GS, knowing that in 12 months time, they will be faced will this same debacle and enormous fee all over again!

I eagerly await a detailed response from O2.
Message 1 of 39
4,379 Views
38 REPLIES 38

Anonymous
Not applicable
That's a great point about the phones still being locked to the network at the end of the contracts and also great to highlight AT&T's pricing. I'm confident that the wholesale prices have not changed significantly but that O2's cost absorption model means that they are absorbing the fixed cost of gaining exclusivity by increasing the claimed "cost" of each iPhone to them.
Message 11 of 39
1,118 Views

Anonymous
Not applicable
The other point is that Apple clearly announced the same retail price points as in 2008: $199 and $299. AT&T are sticking to these price points.
.



Tariff 900 inc minutes = $59.99 plus Data Plan for iPhone $30.00 a month (Taken From AT&T website)Total is £89.99PM.

So if you think AT&T is so great move to the US and become one of their customers.
The mobile network In America is actually quite poor and not a patch on the Uk or Europe.

You cannot quote prices in dollars and use exchange rates to convert. If your earn dollars you buy in dollars same with pounds and euros.

At the end of the day if you dont like it leave plenty of people that will take your place and be happy.
Message 12 of 39
1,118 Views

Anonymous
Not applicable
I'm not comparing dollars and pounds. I'm comparing this year and last year.

AT&Ts tariffs and cost prices of $199 and $299 are the same as for the 3G model.

O2 is the ONLY network who have doubled the cost on the new top-end model. Yes, it has new technology. But old technology gets cheaper as the months go on, so why is the 16Gb phone the same price a year on?

There is not a single electronic product whose price increases as time and product refreshes go on. This year's top consumer technology is not substantially more expensive than last years. This year's top of the range computer might have more RAM and a faster processor, but it's the roughly the same price as a top of the range computer from last year. That's how it works.

Why can I buy a 32Gb solid state drive for the difference in cost between the 16Gb and 32Gb iPhone 3GS?
Message 13 of 39
1,118 Views

Anonymous
Not applicable
1 thing

"Point 2: Name one other phone that carries a £200+ price tag on an 18/24 month contract? In fact, name one other phone that carries any kind of substantial price tag on such a long contract? There are none!! Thus it's clear: the iPhone is not simply another mobile phone! The price/contract situation is completely unparalleled so to now attempt to impose a blanket upgrade policy, saying that all O2 contracts adhere to the same rules smacks of moving the goalposts! "


Nokia 8800 - Voda, 24m contract, £45pcm, Handset price £310.99

I've already answered the other points ad nauseum around the forum.
Message 14 of 39
1,118 Views

Anonymous
Not applicable
What I can't get my head around is the fact that come 3GS launch day everybodys' 3G Iphone will stop working,

or am I missing the point here ?
Message 15 of 39
1,118 Views

Anonymous
Not applicable
What I can't get my head around is the fact that come 3GS launch day everybodys' 3G Iphone will stop working,
or am I missing the point here ?


They don't stop working, they spontaneously combust. The few that don't will just laugh at their owner because they have a pitiful compass.

Wanty (in Iphone envy mode)
Message 16 of 39
1,118 Views

Anonymous
Not applicable
i upgraded to an iphone 3g 2 months ago with no mention of this new release from O2. now signed to a 24 month contract...

disgraceful that i was not told of this before signing
Message 17 of 39
1,118 Views

Anonymous
Not applicable
i upgraded to an iphone 3g 2 months ago with no mention of this new release from O2. now signed to a 24 month contract...
disgraceful that i was not told of this before signing


You wasn't told because people didn't know. All o2 employee's found out the second you did.
Message 18 of 39
1,118 Views

Anonymous
Not applicable
In the news today: http://www.computerworld.com/action/art ... Id=9134267

AT&T has 48 hours to answer iPhone pricing complaints, says crisis expert
More than 8,000 sign Twitter petition demanding that AT&T rethink iPhone 3G S surcharge

If this works for AT&T customers then please try it for O2 Customers.
Please
Petition: O2 to offer reasonable iPhone 3GS upgrade and tethering #o2fail http://twitition.com/owzm4
Message 19 of 39
1,118 Views

Anonymous
Not applicable
I'm sorry but o2 must have known for a while this was on the cards. Ok they might not have told the call centre staff but they should have. O2 were not told the same day as us.
Message 20 of 39
1,118 Views