on 26-08-2012 17:36
on 26-08-2012 17:36
on 06-09-2012 16:34
on 06-09-2012 16:34
on 07-09-2012 14:51
Thanks for the comments.
I have recently been watching the strength of the O2 signal around the Canterbury area using the Bluetooth in my car. It is very poor or non-existent to the East of the city (I live here), and parts of the A2 are not covered. The signal is also non-existent in parts of the city centre.
Using O2 in this area is a bit like Orange was in the late 1990s - you know, ducking and diving to find a signal, wandering around the house to try and find a useable signal, calls dropping out and being told that you sound like a Dalek.
I had assumed that all of the mobile companies had pretty got most population centres, main roads and university towns covered but with O2 I was obviously mistaken......
on 16-09-2012 16:04
Further to my earlier posts, I have been informed that there are now 3 universities in Canterbury.
Providing poor coverage in a university city is perhaps not the best business decision 02 has ever made. Do they have market researchers?
In coverage terms, 02 have been left behind in this area.
on 27-06-2013 10:02
I'm shocked quite how bad the O2 coverage is in SW London (Putney). I've got a couple of old Nokia phones on an Orange account that give perfect reception all the time. I was recently provided with a Smartphone from work on an O2 account - this is barely useable in most parts of SW15. In fact I switched from an iPhone-4 to a Blackberry Bold as I originally blamed the poor reception on the iPhone being more "smart" then "phone". The reception on the Blackberry is just as bad. I've also got a broadband dongle on an O2 account which is barely useable. It's not only SW London. I regularly commute to Leicester on business and the O2 signal is virtually non-existant along most of the route. Again, the Orange signal is always good to excellent.