19-01-2015 09:07
23-01-2015 18:59
23-01-2015 18:59
23-01-2015 19:06
@Anonymous wrote:
This was because it was contractual. Telefonica included it as part of the contract as they have other o2 units around the world.
It is common practice.
Quite possibly. But the article that @iar1980 linked, suggests that it's a decision that could go either way:
“If it ditched the O2 brand – and its unclear if it would be allowed to maintain it – it would be a shame, because the O2 brand is well understood and well known by consumers. It has a good name and good reputation in the UK.”
23-01-2015 19:17
23-01-2015 19:17
23-01-2015 19:23 - edited 23-01-2015 19:25
To be honest, if they can deliver a better network, that manages to combine their respective strengths in terms of broadband speed and call quality, they can call it whatever they like
23-01-2015 19:51
23-01-2015 19:51
For the first time today it is featuring in every BBC News programme.
I understand the BBC hold fire until they have good reason to go with the story
We will see...
Veritas Numquam Perit
23-01-2015 22:46
23-01-2015 22:46
It all depends on the final deal. If Hutchison Whampoa completely buy out o2, the brand will be dropped within 12 months and changed to Three, but if a different type of deal is done where telefonica keep a small stake in o2, then who knows what may transpire......
23-01-2015 22:58
23-01-2015 22:58
27-01-2015 00:05
27-01-2015 00:05
24-03-2015 18:04 - edited 24-03-2015 18:05
24-03-2015 18:04 - edited 24-03-2015 18:05
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-32043874
24-03-2015 18:41 - last edited on 25-03-2015 08:41 by Toby
It was only 3 months ago when Ronan Dunne stated that Telefonica would not sell o2 at all.
Someone wondering where he will be working in future? He has presided over a network that is failing to deliver to its customers but conversely has picked up huge numbers of customers through selling mvno deals at suicidal prices.