on 14-10-2013 18:22
on 14-10-2013 18:22
Solved! Go to Solution.
on 11-03-2016 17:12
on 11-03-2016 17:12
@Curr946 wrote:
No, but wouldn't it be great. Then networks would have to entice us with price and service only.
Well o2 will have to by end of 2017 (98% coverage by population points indoors with a min data speed of 2mb) as per the license granted to them during the 4g auction . http://licensing.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/spectrum/mobile-wireless-broadband/cellular/licences/SA_800_L...
on 11-03-2016 18:07
on 11-03-2016 18:07
The big issue is that the 98%will live in major cities or towns and the fringe rural areas will still be poorly covered. People really need to try all the networks but with the various buyouts and takeovers choice is going to be limited to one of three.
on 11-03-2016 18:15
on 11-03-2016 18:15
@jonsie agreed I did have a link to how ofcom worked the 98% out it was a long document and I will dig it out again .
But only o2 are obliged to do this so may in the end be the one to go for unless all do it voluntarily
Just my take !
on 30-06-2016 08:22
on 30-06-2016 08:22
I am about to move into a rural area with a marginal 3G O2 signal, away from a good 4G location.
Does O2, or any of its partners, offer anything equivalent to the Vodafone Sure Signal booster, which residents in my new location are using?
on 30-06-2016 08:27
on 30-06-2016 08:27
on 30-06-2016 09:01
Thanks for the prompt reply.
I have TU available on my phone but of course it seldoms gets used with an otherwise good mobile signal. I'll have to wait and see how it performs when the signal is significantly inferior on a daily basis.
on 30-06-2016 14:25
on 30-06-2016 14:25
You really need a good wifi signal.
on 30-06-2016 14:32
on 08-10-2016 14:01
on 08-10-2016 14:06
on 08-10-2016 14:06