<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp;amp; O2 Merger in Discussions &amp; Feedback</title>
    <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945956#M78144</link>
    <description>That's how business is done, perhaps not by cash means now buy by other "Incentives"</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:38:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Curr946</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-04T16:38:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945943#M78141</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.engadget.com/2016/02/04/three-o2-merger-threat/?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_self"&gt;http://www.engadget.com/2016/02/04/three-o2-merger-threat/?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;amp;utm_medium=twitter&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thought this was an interesting read.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:10:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945943#M78141</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhoneChanger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T16:10:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945947#M78142</link>
      <description>What happens after the 5 year freeze is potentially worrying......</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:16:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945947#M78142</guid>
      <dc:creator>MI5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T16:16:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945948#M78143</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Living in the real world I reckon it all boils down to greasy palms, backhanders and brown envelopes. Cynical? Me? Never....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:17:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945948#M78143</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonsie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T16:17:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945956#M78144</link>
      <description>That's how business is done, perhaps not by cash means now buy by other "Incentives"</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:38:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945956#M78144</guid>
      <dc:creator>Curr946</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T16:38:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945963#M78149</link>
      <description>Three did at one point to me seem to offer the most competitive rates. This did seem to slowly creep up and up and more so recently with the news of their legacy plan now costing double!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yeah there is obviously inflation and stuff but they definitely went about it totally wrong!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm really not sure how I feel on the whole o2/Three merger to be totally honest.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945963#M78149</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T16:56:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945992#M78162</link>
      <description>If three were to take over they would have to align their pricing - I guess they are still confident of securing the merger.....?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:48:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945992#M78162</guid>
      <dc:creator>MI5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T17:48:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945995#M78163</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm sure they are which is why they seem to be aligning prices.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:51:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/945995#M78163</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonsie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T17:51:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946051#M78174</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well it's going to be interesting to see if it does go ahead then....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 19:12:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946051#M78174</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cleoriff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T19:12:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946052#M78175</link>
      <description>Most likely depend on factors outside of either companies control in the end.....</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 19:14:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946052#M78175</guid>
      <dc:creator>MI5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T19:14:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946081#M78186</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Surely it needs to happen, or at least Telefonica needs it to happen &lt;img id="smileyindifferent" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyindifferent" src="https://community.o2.co.uk/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.gif" alt="Smiley Indifferent" title="Smiley Indifferent" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 19:51:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946081#M78186</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T19:51:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946082#M78187</link>
      <description>Telefonica definitely need it to.....!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 19:52:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946082#M78187</guid>
      <dc:creator>MI5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T19:52:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946138#M78190</link>
      <description>Why?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 22:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946138#M78190</guid>
      <dc:creator>Curr946</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T22:02:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946145#M78191</link>
      <description>Debts</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 22:10:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946145#M78191</guid>
      <dc:creator>MI5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T22:10:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946173#M78192</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24643"&gt;@MI5&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;What happens after the 5 year freeze is potentially worrying......&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't worry after 5 years, prices are still going to go up in between as per the contract annual inflation rise thus the freeze will only be in the context of the current T&amp;amp;C's.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now somewhere in my mind I thought I read an article saying there's going to be an increase on all networks in this year over something forced onto them by ofcom. Can't remember what it is though but it got me seriously thinking if I needed to have a contract these days.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 23:12:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946173#M78192</guid>
      <dc:creator>sheepdog</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-04T23:12:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946191#M78196</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;More info released here from the Telegraph so it's certainly gathering momentum.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/telecoms/12139250/Millions-to-see-mobile-phone-bills-frozen-under-Three-O2-merger-plans.html" target="_self"&gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/telecoms/12139250/Millions-to-see-mobile-phone-bills-frozen-under-Three-O2-merger-plans.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:25:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946191#M78196</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cleoriff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-05T00:25:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946206#M78203</link>
      <description>If the sell back spectrum it defeats the point, network wise</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:30:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946206#M78203</guid>
      <dc:creator>Curr946</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-05T07:30:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946209#M78205</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Interesting that Ofcom are totally opposed to it quoting&amp;nbsp; four rival mobile operators are required to protect consumers. I would be tempted to ask why BT and EE had no opposition from them. That takeover was allowed to go through with no problems.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:46:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946209#M78205</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cleoriff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-05T07:46:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946210#M78206</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the reasoning for their approval was that bt were a small operator in the mobile industry, meaning there were still 4 big companies and likewise ee were small in the home broadband industry.&lt;BR /&gt;overall they saw the deal as having little impact...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;edited to add links:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;competition and markets page (with links to all documents) -&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/bt-ee-merger-inquiry" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/bt-ee-merger-inquiry&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;summary (still 15 pages, but the complete investigation was&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;373&lt;/STRONG&gt; pages) -&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://assets.digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk/media/5697d55aed915d474700001d/BT-EE_summary_final_report.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://assets.digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk/media/5697d55aed915d474700001d/BT-EE_summary_final_report.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 07:55:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946210#M78206</guid>
      <dc:creator>gmarkj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-05T07:55:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946213#M78208</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes I knew this was their rationale but it doesn't look quite so convincing when you look at the market share graph. (I know it involves more than looking at pretty pictures but I am just saying):smileywink:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/16453i8A1053C0C76C58E1/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" alt="market share.JPG" title="market share.JPG" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:10:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946213#M78208</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cleoriff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-05T08:10:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interesting Article 3 &amp; O2 Merger</title>
      <link>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946214#M78209</link>
      <description>I guess Voda would have some strong objections too, looking at that graph.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 08:13:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.o2.co.uk/t5/Discussions-Feedback/Interesting-Article-3-amp-O2-Merger/m-p/946214#M78209</guid>
      <dc:creator>MI5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-05T08:13:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

