23-01-2015 19:21 - edited 23-01-2015 19:22
23-01-2015 19:21 - edited 23-01-2015 19:22
on 30-01-2015 00:07
on 30-01-2015 00:07
on 30-01-2015 00:10
on 30-01-2015 00:20
on 30-01-2015 00:20
on 30-01-2015 00:34
on 30-01-2015 00:34
@Cleoriff wrote:
@viridis wrote:
Because they need concrete proof to avoid the courtsSurely not @viridis How many times do we see Watchdog running with a story...only airing one side and then saying 'We approached so and so company...they declined to comment'?...
Because they put the "evidence" to the company and tell them it will be broadcast and would they like to comment on screen.
on 30-01-2015 00:56
on 30-01-2015 00:56
@Beenherebefore wrote:
@Cleoriff wrote:
@viridis wrote:
Because they need concrete proof to avoid the courtsSurely not @viridis How many times do we see Watchdog running with a story...only airing one side and then saying 'We approached so and so company...they declined to comment'?...
Because they put the "evidence" to the company and tell them it will be broadcast and would they like to comment on screen.
I realise that @Beenherebefore . I was just replying to Viridis's comment. I said that the media does not need concrete proof to run a story....Its how they run with it...and a clever choice of words.
ie "some customers of Joe Bloggs supermarket are claiming they were made ill by contaminated meat sold by them last week"......(That alone would be enough to stop people frequenting Joe Bloggs supermarket)
Veritas Numquam Perit
on 30-01-2015 17:09
Well I've written to Watchdog anyway. Not sure whether anything will come of it and I don't care whether O2 decline to comment should they run a story about it. The point is that people would be alerted to the fact that some kind of security breach probably did take place and O2's failure to do acknowledge it in any meaningful way wouldn't exactly boost confidence in them as a company.
Secondly, I am still absolutely furious that my details are now in the hands of people devoid of any kind moral scruples through NO FAULT OF MY OWN and I await massive credit card debts and whatever else they see fit to run up in my name because they are such useless scum that they can't be bothered to make an honest, hard earned living like the rest of us.
Yeah thanks for your support with this O2.
on 30-01-2015 19:55 - last edited on 02-02-2015 08:59 by Toby
Ok ladies and gents I have now had a reply from Senior Management at O2 regarding these phishing emails and their response (in my words as it was a telephone call) is as follows:
1. O2 Senior Management have confirmed that they DO want phishing emails sent to them, even if they are already aware of the issue.
2. Where emails are purported to include the PUK number, have the recipient's checked that they PUK is actually the right one for their account? (It may be that the scammers are blagging it).
3. Re the serial number of the phone, same as number 2 above.
If these details are CORRECT in relation to the customer account then these need to be flagged to the phishing email address o2 have phishing@o2.co.uk
O2 are confident that the data has not been leaked from their own systems (I know we will all say "well they would say that wouldn't they? ) but never the less they were clear.
I asked why o2 were silent on the matter. The response was that there are many phishing scams and they can't possibly be expected to contact customers every single time a phishing email is sent.
I have suggested that perhaps every 6 or 12 months or so when they send us billing emails perhaps they could include information about phishing and other scams. O2 Senior Management plan to take the idea forward to the Fraud Team for consideration.
on 30-01-2015 20:03
on 30-01-2015 20:03
on 30-01-2015 20:09
on 30-01-2015 20:09
on 30-01-2015 20:25
on 30-01-2015 20:25
@Anonymous wrote:
Totally agree. I hope Watchdog do pick this up
I'm pretty sure they will and when O2 are contavted I'm sure any statement will be along similar lines as your post above.